Buildertrend vs Procore (2023 ): Which Construction Software Application deserves it?


Buildertrend or Procore? This guide compares the functions, pros, cons, and prices of each building and construction software application to help you make an informed decision.

Buildertrend and Procore are highly-rated software tools in the realm of construction task management. Buildertrend is more focused on residential construction jobs, as it offers a suite of tools tailored to the special requirements of home builders, remodelers and specialized specialists, intending to streamline project, consumer and service management.

On the other hand, Procore emerges as an all-rounded platform appropriate for a vast array of construction projects. Its substantial function set is designed to accommodate the complexities of commercial, industrial and residential building and construction alike, providing a robust option for project and resource management and monetary control.

Jump to:

Buildertrend vs Procore: Comparison table

Feature Buildertrend Procore
File management Yes Yes
Version control No Yes
Task management Yes Yes
RFI and submittal management Yes Yes
Reporting and dashboards Yes Yes
Time tracking Yes Yes
Starting cost $99/month Contact for quote

Buildertrend vs. Procore: Prices

Buildertrend prices

Buildertrend uses a tier-based pricing model, making it accessible for companies of various sizes. Their strategies range from Essential to Advanced and Total plans. The Essential strategy begins at $199 per month when billed monthly, followed by a cost of $499 each month after the first month.

The Advanced and Total strategies follow the very same pattern: The Advanced plan starts at $399 per month and rises to $699 per month after the first month, and the Complete strategy begins at $699 per month and rises to $999 per month after the very first month. When billed yearly, the Necessary, Advanced and Total strategies cost $339, $599 and $829 monthly respectively.

To learn more, check out our thorough Buildertrend evaluation.

Procore rates

Procore, on the other hand, runs on a custom-made rates model. The cost is tailored to the particular needs of your company, which indicates you pay for precisely what you need. This implies that the software application doesn’t openly disclose its rates information. This makes it challenging to forecast costs in advance, as they can differ significantly depending on the functions and services you require. Additionally, there may be hidden costs related to execution, training or extra services that are not immediately apparent.

For a more in-depth analysis of Procore, have a look at our complete Procore review.

Function comparison: Buildertrend vs. Procore

Document management

Buildertrend’s file management (Figure A) system is designed to assist building professionals digitize and arrange their files efficiently. It uses a centralized place for all project-related files, making it simple for teams to access, share and work together on files. This system is especially advantageous for keeping project paperwork arranged and accessible, reducing the threat of losing important files.

Figure A

Buildertrend document management. Image: Document management in Buildertrend. In contrast, Procore’s file management system goes an action further by integrating innovative version control. This feature guarantees that all stakeholders are working with the most existing files and can easily track changes over time. The variation control capability is especially helpful for complex tasks with several modifications, as it preserves a clear history of document development.

Task management

Task management in Buildertrend is extensive, enabling teams to appoint jobs, set deadlines and keep an eye on development. The platform’s task-tracking abilities make certain that all team members know their responsibilities and due dates, promoting responsibility and timely completion of tasks.

Figure B

Procore task management. Image: Project jobs displayed in Procore. Procore integrates task management(Figure B)with job data, offering a more holistic view of jobs in relation to overall project turning points and objectives. This combination enables construction teams to better align tasks with task objectives and assist in more effective task management.

RFI and submittal management

RFI and submittal management are structured in both Buildertrend and Procore. Both platforms enable effective handling of RFIs (Figure C) and submittals, however Procore provides the added benefit of connecting these straight to task documents, boosting traceability and reducing the risk of miscommunication.

Figure C

Procore RFI analytics.

Image: RFI analytics in Procore. Reporting and control panels Buildertrend provides users with the ability to generate a range of reports to track task development and financials. The platform’s reporting functions are personalized, enabling users to tailor reports to their particular requirements and gain insights into task efficiency.

Procore’s reporting is more robust, using customizable control panels that offer stakeholders a real-time view of project health, development and dangers. The control panels are designed to provide a thorough summary of task data, facilitating data-driven decision-making.

Time tracking

Buildertrend uses Time Clock (Figure D), which is a digital timesheet that allows groups to track time spent on various tasks and projects. This feature is important for managing labor costs and ensuring that job timelines are abided by.

Figure D

Buildertrend time clock feature. Image: Buildertrend’s Time Clock feature in action. Procore incorporates timecard management with budget plan products, supplying a clearer photo of labor costs in relation to the general job budget plan. This combination is helpful for maintaining monetary control and enhancing resource allotment throughout the task lifecycle.

Buildertrend benefits and drawbacks


  • More niched item than Procore.
  • Comprehensive project tracking from start to complete.
  • Outstanding consumer support and training resources.


  • Some features might be frustrating for smaller sized jobs.
  • Its tier-based pricing can become very expensive as you scale.
  • Its knowing curve can be steep.

Procore advantages and disadvantages


  • Vast capabilities that cover all construction job management elements.
  • UI that is easy to navigate and utilize.
  • Robust cooperation tools.


  • Its customized rates model can make rates feel nontransparent.
  • Its roster of functions can overwhelm new users.
  • The scalability is limited.


More job management protection

Our contrast is based upon a thorough evaluation of each product’s site, official blog sites, user evaluations and product demos to provide us a holistic understanding of the product usage cases, item feel and their targeted consumers. We analyzed the two software application tools throughout their core construction task management abilities, ease of use, client support and pricing. How real-world users reacted to the products also affected our comparison.

Should Your company usage Buildertrend or Procore?

The choice between Buildertrend and Procore comes down to your construction job management requirements. If you’re a small to mid-sized construction firm, particularly concentrating on property building and construction, Buildertrend may be the best choice for you as it best serves specialty professionals, home contractors and remodelers. Nevertheless, if you’re a bigger company that would choose a tool with a robust set of features and comprehensive third-party integrations, Procore’s detailed toolset could be preferable.

Ultimately, both Buildertrend and Procore provide compelling benefits for construction management. Elements that should influence your choice are company size, project intricacy and budget plan considerations, to name a few.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *