Do not let buzzwords drive your cloud architecture

Uncategorized

Buzzwords drive the IT market– constantly have and constantly will. This is true whether you deal with structured programs, object-oriented programs, client/server, distributed objects, business application combination, information warehousing, and service-oriented architecture. Now it’s cloud computing with all its related buzzwords. We tend to go after the hyped trends.This industrywide practice drove me to coin the term “manage by publication, “where the coolness of a principle or term becomes more important than the actual applied value. Today I call it “buzzword-oriented architecture, “or BOA. The problem with this method is that you try to solve a problem by force-fitting a particular solution, no matter fit. Simply put, you”understand” the answer before you genuinely understand the problem.The overuse of containers and container orchestration nowadays offers some of the very best examples of BOA. Although containers and container orchestration are potent approaches to turning net-new and existing applications into better and scalable workloads, they don’t fit every application or every system. This is the most common mistake I see today, as enterprises spend twice as much updating a workload that didn’t truly need to be containerized, all because somebody wanted to put containers on their CV.Why am I bringing it up now if it’s a known and veteran issue? I see BOA drive a lot of cloud architectures these days, with enterprises paying the rate for expensive errors. As I covered here, these architectures “work,”but since they function at a much lower level of expense efficiency, business usually spend 2 to 3 times more than a better-optimized solution. Simply take a look at the misapplications of containers to see numerous examples of this pricey problem.The Wall Street Journal recently reported that business executives say their expenses have risen as they moved to cloud computing. Why? Cloud computing didn’t stop working the business; those who developed the cloud solutions stopped working the business. Rather of finding the most affordable and enhanced cloud architecture, they took a BOA approach that started with responses prior to there was a clear understanding of the questions.I have actually developed many IT architecture principles and lots of buzzwords in my profession. The threat comes when those concepts and buzzwords are misapplied and we erroneously blame the concept, not the individual who misapplied it. While this is frustrating, the more substantial effect is that we don’t live up to the expectations of the business. As IT professionals, we should provide the most enhanced and cost-efficient option possible with all readily available technology. The majority of people have great intentions. Nevertheless, numerous IT personnel lack the depth of cloud understanding or experience needed for cloud optimization, or they lack the time and money required to gain that understanding. The speed at which we can deploy cloud services nowadays enhances the BOA issue. BOA is generally less efficient and therefore drives much higher cloud bills. Furthermore, cloud systems expense in manner ins which reward resource-efficient

systems. This is why most enterprises do not recognize their anticipated ROI for cloud computing. Take the time to look beyond the buzzwords. Copyright © 2023 IDG Communications, Inc. Source

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *