Is it much better to keep track of for quality or discover problems? It depends. Here’s how to pick between active and passive information governance.
Image: Friends Stock/Adobe Stock The goal of data governance is to allow information operations that can help provide great organization value while concurrently supporting data quality, security, compliance and privacy. To attain these data governance goals, there are 2 types of data governance that company can utilize: active and passive.
What is passive data governance?
Typically, the more frequently utilized data governance structure has been passive information governance, in which the primary step is data input by users. For many companies, information is added to an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system.
All governance policies and procedures are applied after the information has actually been input. This includes creating exceptions, cleaning operations, developing workflows, and determining and removing duplicates. Passive data governance is thought about the more reactive technique.
SEE: Electronic data disposal policy (TechRepublic Premium)
What is active data governance?
Active data governance means data verification takes place before information is input into the system, usually as quickly as the data is gathered. This assists guarantee the veracity of data which information quality meets the requirements of the organization.
It likewise makes sure information satisfies quality requirements as soon as it’s added to an available company database. Active information governance is considered the more proactive method.
What are the differences between active and passive governance?
Must-read big data coverage
The main difference in between these 2 types of data governance is that with active information governance, the data quality check happens at the start of the data’s life cycle, as soon as it’s collected. With passive information governance, data quality checks come at a later phase of the data life process, generally once it’s currently kept in an accessible information platform.
As the quality of data is not evaluated prior to data gets in the system, passive data governance can result in mistakes and inconsistencies. It can also lead to replicate or insufficient information, which is not ideal for an organization that wants to be nimble in its decision-making processes.
For business in heavily managed markets, passive information governance can be dangerous, as corrupt or incomplete data might cause non-compliance. Passive information governance also consumes valuable resources to clean up the data after it has actually gone into the system, which can be more lengthy and tough compared to cleaning the information before it is input.
Which governance model is best for your organization?
A company that is new to information governance can start by developing a passive data governance technique, which is eventually a much easier and still-beneficial data governance framework to have in place. As information requirements become more advanced, the company can think about transferring to active data governance, which has some clear advantages in regards to performance and reliability.
Companies in greatly regulated industries, such as those in the pharmaceutical space, might require to use an active information governance structure to confirm all data before it gets in an ERP system. Implementing an active information governance system can be more difficult, however the benefits can be worth the effort.
No matter whether you pick an active or a passive design for your data governance technique, you’re taking a crucial action in the ideal instructions. Having some form of data governance is better than having no data governance framework at all.
No matter what information governance design you select, the ideal data governance tools can support your company in its information governance method. Take a look at these leading information governance tools and discover how they can help your business.
